hold arrow

Subscriptions and the COVID Effect

1 min read · 78 views Bong-Geun Choi Mar 02, 2023

The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated lockdowns created an upheaval in consumer behavior and spending patterns.  Unable to move about freely, spending patterns shifted to industries enabling “at-home” lifestyles such as delivery and e-commerce.  As economies began opening up, much of these spending patterns reverted closer to their pre-pandemic norms.  One exception was spending on subscriptions, according to a recent study written about in the Wall Street Journal.[1]


Why have subscriptions bucked the trend?


COVID-19 Drives Substitution Spending

Unable to leave their homes, individuals appeared to have substituted spending that occurred in physical locations for their online or delivery counterparts.  This shift in spending was more pronounced among consumption patterns involving impulsive or discretionary purchases, such as apparel and restaurant dining, compared to categories involving more routine items, such as meal kits.


Subscription Spending Was the Exception

However, the study found that subscription spending did not experience the decline that other categories did.  It did not revert to its pre-pandemic spending.


What may explain the stickiness of subscription spending?


Explaining the Stickiness of Subscription Spending

One reason that may explain why subscription spending did not decline with the lifting of lockdown restrictions is that many subscriptions renew automatically. This “autopilot” feature of many subscriptions helps companies retain subscriptions in several ways:

  • People forget to cancel their subscriptions
  • Some continued with their subscription because they found it too difficult to cancel
  • Others continued their subscription because they thought they might need the product or service again in the future
  • The longer individuals maintain their subscription, the more likely they are to feel that the product or service is necessary rather than a “nice-to-have”


Another potential reason is that people consistently underestimate what they spend on subscriptions.  The study showed that nearly 100% of subscribers were unaware of what they actually spend on subscriptions.  Many were spending 3.4 times more on subscriptions than they thought they were.


Given the commitment involved in signing up for a subscription, consumers may be more thoughtful before subscribing to a product or service.  Thus, they may be less likely to cancel the subscription.


Consumers may be satisfied with their subscription experience and, therefore, likely to continue the service.


Subscriptions May Lead to Longer-Term Sales Gains

The COVID pandemic resulted in a boost to subscription revenue that appears to be long-term.  It also demonstrates the power of subscriptions to lead to longer-term financial benefits.


Therefore, companies that offer subscription services may provide individuals with an attractive investment opportunity.


The Fount Subscription Economy ETF (SUBS)

The Fount Subscription Economy ETF (SUBS) seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, generally correspond to the total return performance of the Fount Subscription Economy Index.  The Index was designed to measure the performance of companies engaged in the business of providing subscription services, i.e., companies that sell products or services for recurring subscription revenue.


SUBS may present an attractive vehicle for individuals to gain exposure to companies offering subscription-based pricing models.




[1] Forman, Laura, Your Wallet Is Being Drained by Subscriptions.  Wall Street Thanks You, The Wall Street Journal, 12/9/22; Oblander, Shin & McCarthy, Daniel Minh, Estimating the Long-Term Impact of Major Events on Consumption Patters: Evidence from COVID-19, 11/29/22


Bong-Geun Choi

Chief Economist


More Posts

How the Metaverse May Impact Corporations

1 min read · 24 views Bong-Geun Choi Mar 24, 2023

How Can Subscription Companies Weather Economic Downturns?

1 min read · 65 views Bong-Geun Choi Mar 16, 2023

How the Metaverse May Change 'Business as Usual'

1 min read · 64 views Bong-Geun Choi Mar 13, 2023

Metaverse Technologies May Redefine Traditional Gathering Spaces

1 min read · 128 views Bong-Geun Choi Feb 22, 2023

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. For a prospectus or summary prospectus with this and other information about the Fund, please call 855-425-7426 or visit our website at www.fountetfs.com. Read the prospectus or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC. serves as the investment advisor to the Funds. The Funds are distributed by SEI Investments Distribution Co., (SIDCO) 1 Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456. SIDCO is not affiliated with Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC. or Fount Investment Co. Ltd.

Risk Disclosure:


Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee the Funds will achieve their stated objectives. In addition to the normal risks associated with investing, international investments may involve the risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuation in currency values, differences in generally accepted accounting principles, or social, economic, or political instability in other nations. Emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors, as well as increased volatility and lower trading volume. 


The Funds’ concentration in an industry or sector can increase the impact of, and potential losses associated with, the risks from investing in those industries/sectors. For MTVR, the Fund may be concentrated in the entertainment and interactive media & services industries. The entertainment industry is highly competitive and relies on consumer spending and the availability of disposable income for success, which may cause the prices of the securities of companies to fluctuate widely. The prices of the securities of companies in the interactive media & services industry are closely tied to the overall economy's performance. Changes in general economic growth, consumer confidence, and consumer spending may affect them. MTVR may also be subject to the specific risks associated with metaverse companies. These risks include but are not limited to small or limited markets, changes in business cycles, world economic growth, technological progress, rapid obsolescence, and government regulation. Smaller, start-up companies tend to be more volatile than securities of companies that do not rely heavily on technology. Metaverse Companies may rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secret laws to establish and protect their proprietary rights. There can be no assurance that these steps will be adequate to prevent the misappropriation of their technology or that competitors will not develop technologies that are equivalent or superior to such companies’ technology.


For SUBS, the Fund may be concentrated in the software industry. Technological changes, pricing, retaining skilled employees, changes in demand, research & development, and product obsolescence can affect the profitability of software companies causing fluctuations in the market price of company securities. 


Both Funds are subject to communication services sector risk, which can involve the same risks as being concentrated in the software industry. Network security breaches, potential proprietary or consumer information theft, or service disruption can negatively affect companies’ stock prices.


The Funds are non-diversified. The Funds are new and have limited operating histories for investors to evaluate. New and smaller funds may not attract sufficient assets to achieve investment and trading efficiencies. In addition to the normal risks associated with investing, investments in smaller companies typically exhibit higher volatility.